50D/72f · 50D/36f
49–51 denier · rPET- In this application
- Mechanical route, the lightest band: light knits and lining programmes.
- Tenacity
- 2.7–3.3 cN/dtex
Arrow keys navigate · Enter opens · Esc closes
Alongside strictly necessary cookies, we use functional and analytics cookies only with your consent. You can choose your preferences and change them any time. Cookie Policy
Manage each category separately. Strictly necessary cookies are required for the site to work and cannot be turned off.
Required for the site’s core functions, security and remembering your cookie preference — including form security (hCaptcha). No consent required.
Displays embedded content such as Google Maps. When off, the map does not load until you click “Show map”.
Helps us improve the site by measuring visit statistics. Currently inactive; when enabled it runs only with your consent.
Yarn Manufacturing Programme
Recycling is not a label but a choice of route. We run both the mechanical and the chemical route; they process different waste, deliver different strength and suit different programmes. This page puts them side by side.
The mechanical route washes, flakes and re-melts post-consumer PET bottles. It is the most common and most accessible path, but it carries a technical cost that we do not hide in the table: tenacity of 2.7–3.7 cN/dtex sits below virgin polyester's 3.6–4.5 band. The reason is chemical — PET is hygroscopic, moisture in the chain hydrolyses the ester bond at melt temperature and intrinsic viscosity falls. In practice, that makes machine tension and batch consistency more critical.
The chemical route closes that gap by a measurable margin. Depolymerisation breaks PET back to its monomer and repolymerisation re-extends the chain, compensating the loss of intrinsic viscosity and lifting tenacity to 3.0–3.8 cN/dtex — above mechanical rPET and just below virgin. Its second advantage is in the feedstock: it can process coloured and mixed waste, which the mechanical route cannot.
Coverage differs between the two routes, and hiding that difference would mislead the buyer. Mechanical rPET runs in 50, 75, 100 and 150 denier; the finest microfilament constructions (144 and 288 filaments) are not part of this family. Chemically regenerated runs in 50, 75 and 100 denier; 150 denier is not available in that family.
Values are typical production bands; exact batch figures are shared in the order report.
| Minimum order (MOQ) | 500–1,000 kg per colour |
|---|---|
| Lead time | Typically 3–4 weeks from order confirmation to dispatch |
| Sampling | Sampling begins after a short technical consultation |
| Response time | Quotation requests answered within 2 business days |
| Delivery terms | EXW · FOB · DAP — shipping plan confirmed with your quotation |
Figures are typical ranges; exact terms are confirmed with your quotation.
Which route is right depends on the recycled-content claim you need to make, the tenacity you are targeting and your colour programme. GRS 4.0 and RCS 2.0 chain of custody apply — these documents evidence traceability of the material, not performance, and it matters not to confuse the two. Recycled content and certification scope are confirmed with the quotation. Quotation requests are answered within 2 business days.
Spec sheet: Recycled Polyester (rPET)
Applications: Sportswear Fabrics · Underwear and Loungewear Fabrics · Home Textile Fabrics
Related calculators: rPET Recycling Savings Calculator — Estimated Energy & Bottle Equivalent · Yarn Count Converter — Denier · Tex · Dtex · Nm · Ne · DPP Data Preparation & Validation — Digital Product Passport Data Card
Related guides: Recycled Polyester (rPET) in Knits · Polyester Recycling: Mechanical and Chemical Routes · The Standards Map: GRS, RCS, OEKO-TEX, bluesign, ZDHC
The link pre-fills the quote form with this yarn.
If the claim and the cost are your priority, mechanical rPET is the common and accessible path. If tenacity and colour flexibility matter more, chemically regenerated fits better: its tenacity sits above mechanical rPET and it can process coloured and mixed waste. The decision should be made together with the performance target.
Both are chain-of-custody standards and evidence the traceability of recycled content. GRS additionally carries social and environmental criteria and chemical restrictions; RCS focuses on content verification alone. Neither certifies the performance of the fabric — they certify where the material came from.
The share is set against the product and the performance target and is documented through the chain of custody. The exact figure is confirmed with the quotation; every claimed share has to be backed by the certification scope.
Mechanical rPET runs in 50, 75, 100 and 150 denier. The finest microfilament constructions — 144 and 288 filaments — are not part of this family; the finest option in rPET is 96 filaments.
It is produced in 50, 75 and 100 denier. There is no 150 denier in that family; where recycling is required in that band, the mechanical rPET route is used.
It is technically possible, but the two fibres differ in tenacity and shrinkage behaviour, so the heat-setting window has to be set accordingly. From a claims standpoint, blended use requires the recycled share to be calculated correctly through the chain of custody.